A MOM'S alleged killing of her three kids has an eerie hyperlink to a different heinous crime dedicated by a mom.
Lindsay Clancy's case has been known as "strikingly comparable" to Andrea Yates' horror 2001 killing of her 5 kids.
Clancy, 32, has attended courtroom proceedings from her hospital mattress after police allege she strangled her three kids with train bands in Duxbury, Massachusetts, on January 24.
Clancy has pleaded not responsible to killing two of her kids - Cora, 5, and Dawson, three.
She additionally pleaded not responsible to strangling her seven-month-old child Callan, who died days later within the hospital.
2001 KILLINGS
Andrea Yates, 58, allegedly known as 911 in 2001 and instructed an officer: "I simply killed my youngsters."
Her 5 kids – Mary, six months outdated; Luke, two; Paul, three; John, 5; and Noah, seven – have been discovered lifeless after being drowned in a tub.
Yates was initially tried for her crimes in 2002, when she was convicted of capital homicide.
Yates was retried in 2006 and located not responsible for motive of madness.
She has remained at in-patient psychological well being amenities since confessing to the crimes.
Yate's lawyer, George Parnham, in contrast the 2 horror instances on Regulation&Crime’s Sidebar podcast.
"After I heard about [Clancy’s] case, I instantly considered Andrea’s case," Parnham mentioned.
Parnham mentioned there have been similarities in Yate's confession to the allegations Clancy now faces.
Parnham mentioned that Yates premeditated the killings and despatched her husband out of the home.
Parnham acknowledged that she wished to ship her kids to heaven and believed that they might solely attain it in the event that they died early.
The allegations Clancy faces are strikingly comparable, in line with Parnham.
Police say that Clancy, like Yates, despatched her husband to get meals for the household.
"They each knew that the husband would cease them," Parnham claimed on the podcast.
Prosecutors mentioned throughout Clancy's arraignment on February 8 that she instructed her husband she heard a male voice telling her to kill the youngsters as a result of "it was her final probability," the Boston Globe reviews.
"They knew they needed to take the lives of these youngsters to save lots of their souls from going to hell," Parnham mentioned.
Yates’ attorneys argued that she had been experiencing extreme post-partum melancholy.
And like with Lindsay Clancy's husband, who requested the general public to forgive her as he had, Yates’ ex-husband forgave her.
He known as her a "loving mom who simply fell to this illness," Fox Information reported.
QUESTIONS ABOUT TRIAL
Clancy stays hospitalized after police say she slit her wrists and jumped out of a second-story window after allegedly strangling her kids.
Her workforce pleaded not responsible on her behalf, citing psychological well being points that allegedly wracked the mom's postnatal thoughts.
Clancy's heart-wrenching case has sparked nationwide conversations on postpartum psychosis as her protection lawyer Kevin Reddington described her as a "zombie" following "overmedication" within the weeks main as much as the killings.
The difficulty has gone to the state degree after a brand new invoice was launched by Massachusetts consultant Jim O'Day which might discover girls who gave beginning inside a 12 months of committing a criminal offense not responsible in the event that they're identified with post-partum psychological well being points, Mass Stay reviews.
The mom's lawyer talked about that she had a short stint in a psychological hospital amid a battle with melancholy three weeks earlier than the fateful day, however was despatched house after 5 days with two new prescriptions.
Reddington famous that Clancy was taking 12 medicines on the time of the killings.
These included Prozac and Seroquel, which allegedly gave her unwanted side effects resembling "homicidal and suicidal ideation."
Regardless of dealing with critical psychological well being struggles, prosecuting attorneys are arguing that Clancy was lucid and dedicated premeditated homicide.
Protection lawyer Duncan Levin not too long ago instructed The U.S. Solar that he believes the trial might be based mostly on Clancy's psychological state.
"This case will not be going to focus on whether or not she dedicated the murders or not," Levin mentioned.
"What will be a difficulty is her psychological state and whether or not she was legally accountable."
Clancy's lawyer instructed Impartial that he plans to argue that she will not be match to face trial.
"I query whether or not she would ever make it to a trial," he mentioned.
"She [is] suicidal. She’s extraordinarily emotional. Nonetheless, she’s unable and has been unable to specific any happiness or disappointment or cry."
The choose ordered Clancy to be transferred to a rehabilitation heart following her hospital keep for psychological well being care.
Post a Comment