Research Firm Hired By Trump To Prove 2020 Election Fraud Came Up Empty: Report

A analysis agency investigated Donald Trump’s assertion that the presidential election was fraudulent, however its findings had been suppressed as a result of they discovered nothing to assist his claims, The Washington Publish reported citing 4 sources accustomed to the matter.

The Berkeley Analysis Group, employed by the previous president’s 2020 marketing campaign, gathered a staff of round a dozen folks to look into alleged voter fraud and irregularities in six states, based on the Publish.

The staff reportedly briefed Trump, his former chief of employees Mark Meadows and others on a convention name held within the final days of 2020 — earlier than Trump held a rally urging his supporters to march on the Capitol previous the Jan. 6, 2021 rebellion. The decision reportedly turned contentious.

However the researchers had checked out “every little thing,” one supply informed the Publish.

“Actually something you can consider. Voter turnout anomalies, date of start anomalies, whether or not lifeless folks voted. If there was something below the solar that could possibly be considered, they checked out it,” the supply stated.

As just lately as Saturday morning, Trump has claimed that the 2020 presidential election was “rigged” or “stolen” from him, pushing varied conspiracy theories about voting machines and election staff.

He has made these claims whilst dozens of lawsuits filed by Trump’s marketing campaign or his allies had been tossed out for lack of proof within the weeks after President Joe Biden’s victory.

Trump continued to make his claims all through the Home choose committee’s monthslong investigation, which revealed that folks near Trump repeatedly tried to inform him there was no proof of fraud.

And apparently, he made them regardless of realizing that a staff of professional researchers he paid to try to discover proof of fraud got here up empty-handed.

The Publish’s supply added: “Similar to any election, there are at all times errors, omissions and irregularities.” However the particular person confused that they weren't practically sufficient to sway the election.

“It was nowhere shut sufficient to what they wished to show,” the supply stated, “and it truly went in each instructions.”

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post