A charity watchdog group mentioned Wednesday that it'll not pursue an investigation into certainly one of Prince Charles’ charities.
The potential of an investigation was raised after a bombshell Sunday Occasions report revealed final month that the royal had accepted baggage of money from the previous prime minister of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim, years in the past.
The Occasions mentioned that Charles accepted the handoffs ― which totaled $3.2 million in money ― from the Qatari politician on three separate events, between 2011 and 2015.
“We've assessed the knowledge offered by the charity and have decided there isn't any additional regulatory function for the fee,” a spokesperson for the Charity Fee mentioned in an announcement shared with HuffPost Wednesday.
The federal government group, which guarantees to carry charities accountable as certainly one of its outlined targets, mentioned it didn't have considerations in regards to the charity’s governance, and that every one “applicable actions” had been taken by the Prince of Wales’ Charitable Basis on the time.
In an announcement given to the Sunday Occasions in June, a spokesperson from Prince Charles’ Clarence Home first denied any misconduct happened.
The spokesperson mentioned that every one donations “had been handed instantly to one of many prince’s charities who carried out the suitable governance and have assured us that every one the right processes had been adopted.”
Graham Smith, CEO of the anti-monarchy group Republic, referred to as on the Charity Fee and the federal government in June to analyze the “surprising” interactions additional.
“Sheikh Hamad faces critical accusations over human rights and has vital monetary and different pursuits right here within the UK,” Smith mentioned on the time in an emailed press launch shared with HuffPost. “Provided that Prince Charles has direct entry to the British prime minister and all authorities ministers, in addition to all cupboard papers, this raises critical moral questions on what the sheikh anticipated in return.”
Smith added that the incident “provides to the intense questions on Prince Charles’ judgement, following from different accusations of cash-for-access and cash-for-honours.”
Post a Comment